<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Practical alternatives to &#8220;Copy Protection&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/07/practical-alternatives-to-copy-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/07/practical-alternatives-to-copy-protection/</link>
	<description>ZOMGWTFHAI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Yeuxdoux</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/07/practical-alternatives-to-copy-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Yeuxdoux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwala.net/blog/?p=18#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I especially like the &quot;make it easy to buy legitimate content&quot; alternative. I&#039;d love to see an SL analogue of Underwriters Laboratories that would certify products as being legitimate. I&#039;d even subscribe to such a service as a customer, because I don&#039;t want to reward thieves; I want to support legitimate makers of quality products. I think it infinitely superior to the DRM approach that works from the assumption that customers are all thieves and crooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I especially like the &#8220;make it easy to buy legitimate content&#8221; alternative. I&#8217;d love to see an SL analogue of Underwriters Laboratories that would certify products as being legitimate. I&#8217;d even subscribe to such a service as a customer, because I don&#8217;t want to reward thieves; I want to support legitimate makers of quality products. I think it infinitely superior to the DRM approach that works from the assumption that customers are all thieves and crooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/07/practical-alternatives-to-copy-protection/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gwala.net/blog/?p=18#comment-19</guid>
		<description>For more ideas see:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/06/27/how-to-make-money-in-second-life-without-being-an-ip-maximalist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/06/27/how-to-make-money-in-second-life-without-being-an-ip-maximalist/&lt;/a&gt;

DRM for Second Life would have the same effect as it has had for music. A single DRM vendor will lock up the market and call the shots for content producers, the same as Apple. 

I doubt that content producers want this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more ideas see:</p>
<p><a href="http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/06/27/how-to-make-money-in-second-life-without-being-an-ip-maximalist/" rel="nofollow">http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/06/27/how-to-make-money-in-second-life-without-being-an-ip-maximalist/</a></p>
<p>DRM for Second Life would have the same effect as it has had for music. A single DRM vendor will lock up the market and call the shots for content producers, the same as Apple. </p>
<p>I doubt that content producers want this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
