Comments on: The State of Open Viewers – December 08 http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/12/the-state-of-open-viewers-december-08/ ZOMGWTFHAI Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:36:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Guesses for OpenSim in 2009 « justincc’s opensim blog http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/12/the-state-of-open-viewers-december-08/comment-page-1/#comment-2774 Guesses for OpenSim in 2009 « justincc’s opensim blog Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:36:59 +0000 http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=87#comment-2774 [...] large margin will remain the Linden Labs Second Life viewer and its derivatives. There are some viewer projects underway that don’t use the Second Life viewer code base at all.  However, a vast number of man years [...] [...] large margin will remain the Linden Labs Second Life viewer and its derivatives. There are some viewer projects underway that don’t use the Second Life viewer code base at all.  However, a vast number of man years [...]

]]> By: Francis Siefken http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/12/the-state-of-open-viewers-december-08/comment-page-1/#comment-2619 Francis Siefken Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:48:21 +0000 http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=87#comment-2619 I wonder if flash would be capable enough and easy enough to program a opensim client in, the potential userbase would suddenly become very big! But perhaps moonlight/silverlight would be more practical. I wonder if flash would be capable enough and easy enough to program a opensim client in, the potential userbase would suddenly become very big! But perhaps moonlight/silverlight would be more practical.

]]> By: Adam Frisby http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/12/the-state-of-open-viewers-december-08/comment-page-1/#comment-2618 Adam Frisby Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:19:16 +0000 http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=87#comment-2618 I haven't heard much about Silverlight 3 - I do recall a chat with someone from Microsoft who indicated it was dropped from 1/2 because of the cross platform requirements (which is fairly understandable given WPF is at least a little biased towards Direct3D-style interfaces). If you have any links to where Silverlight 3's spec is I'd be keen to look at it. I haven’t heard much about Silverlight 3 – I do recall a chat with someone from Microsoft who indicated it was dropped from 1/2 because of the cross platform requirements (which is fairly understandable given WPF is at least a little biased towards Direct3D-style interfaces).

If you have any links to where Silverlight 3’s spec is I’d be keen to look at it.

]]> By: Forest http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2008/12/the-state-of-open-viewers-december-08/comment-page-1/#comment-2614 Forest Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:19:48 +0000 http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=87#comment-2614 Xenki is quite interresting. WPF 3D capabilities are as impressive as easy to code. The version I downloaded and played with is very promising. I bet Silverlight 3 and its 3D capabilities would free Xenki from its "windows only" viewer label :D Xenki is quite interresting. WPF 3D capabilities are as impressive as easy to code. The version I downloaded and played with is very promising.

I bet Silverlight 3 and its 3D capabilities would free Xenki from its “windows only” viewer label :D

]]>