<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 85.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/</link>
	<description>ZOMGWTFHAI</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:36:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: caocao</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8500</link>
		<dc:creator>caocao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8500</guid>
		<description>Great job！Team OSGrid!

My Team also tested that and got some results and share with you and hope you team get more good test result.

But I worry about my test client that maybe not good test because it can not download data from server as real SL viewer for all logins.As you know,now Opensim have neck bottle that network tranfer,but not only CPU/Mem etc.

you can try to login using real SL viewer as you can do and do not forget to delete you cache before every login.I think that you maybe get a new result.

Here is my result:
(1)Conditions
  -Upstream revision 
  -Test servers With UGRM servers and region server

  -Sepc. of test server:
     Xeon 3040@1.86GHz and 3.00GB RAM

  -Test data:Loading about 2000 objects and 12000 prims
  -login one user by each 20 seconds
 
(2)Results:
  -Can login more that 61 users(keep walkinging for 15mins)in fact, can login more ones(maybe about 65 users)

  -Some data about performance of test server side
    users     CPU   Memory(G)  Network(Gbyte)  
     30       10%   1.904      0.517                          
     61       31%   1.904      1.761                          
   and Memory:(average available)
       Network(average Byte Totl/sec)

Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job！Team OSGrid!</p>
<p>My Team also tested that and got some results and share with you and hope you team get more good test result.</p>
<p>But I worry about my test client that maybe not good test because it can not download data from server as real SL viewer for all logins.As you know,now Opensim have neck bottle that network tranfer,but not only CPU/Mem etc.</p>
<p>you can try to login using real SL viewer as you can do and do not forget to delete you cache before every login.I think that you maybe get a new result.</p>
<p>Here is my result:<br />
(1)Conditions<br />
  -Upstream revision<br />
  -Test servers With UGRM servers and region server</p>
<p>  -Sepc. of test server:<br />
     Xeon <a href="mailto:3040@1.86GHz">3040@1.86GHz</a> and 3.00GB RAM</p>
<p>  -Test data:Loading about 2000 objects and 12000 prims<br />
  -login one user by each 20 seconds</p>
<p>(2)Results:<br />
  -Can login more that 61 users(keep walkinging for 15mins)in fact, can login more ones(maybe about 65 users)</p>
<p>  -Some data about performance of test server side<br />
    users     CPU   Memory(G)  Network(Gbyte)<br />
     30       10%   1.904      0.517<br />
     61       31%   1.904      1.761<br />
   and Memory:(average available)<br />
       Network(average Byte Totl/sec)</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keystone Bouchard</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8499</link>
		<dc:creator>Keystone Bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8499</guid>
		<description>Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nebadon Izumi</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8498</link>
		<dc:creator>Nebadon Izumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8498</guid>
		<description>to be more specific its a 2.2ghz Core2Duo with 4gb Ram running on Fedora 9 32bit PAE it has a 7200 RPM SATAII 250gb Drive, its running inside of Mono 2.4.2.3 its a stock mono install no fancy switches or patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be more specific its a 2.2ghz Core2Duo with 4gb Ram running on Fedora 9 32bit PAE it has a 7200 RPM SATAII 250gb Drive, its running inside of Mono 2.4.2.3 its a stock mono install no fancy switches or patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Frisby</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frisby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8497</guid>
		<description>Thought: CSJ2K - a port of the Jpeg2K Java reference to C# done by the libomv team.

Bob Wellman: It&#039;s a 2007-era Core2Duo w/ 4GB of RAM on a 100mbit colocated pipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought: CSJ2K &#8211; a port of the Jpeg2K Java reference to C# done by the libomv team.</p>
<p>Bob Wellman: It&#8217;s a 2007-era Core2Duo w/ 4GB of RAM on a 100mbit colocated pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wellman</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wellman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8496</guid>
		<description>I see comments that the machine used for this test was not the best or biggest avaialable. We at PMgrid are running on very old kit and would like to compare what we have running to the machine you used for the test to better understand why we have concurrency issues. We are running on SVN 9971 so I am hoping its just that.

Would it be possible to publish the full spec of the machine used for the 85 avatar test along with the broadband speeds that its connected on?

If it is as bad as our kit we maybe can look forward to a brighter future in Pmgrid once we next bring Opensim up to the latest release too.

Thanks for all this sterling work guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see comments that the machine used for this test was not the best or biggest avaialable. We at PMgrid are running on very old kit and would like to compare what we have running to the machine you used for the test to better understand why we have concurrency issues. We are running on SVN 9971 so I am hoping its just that.</p>
<p>Would it be possible to publish the full spec of the machine used for the 85 avatar test along with the broadband speeds that its connected on?</p>
<p>If it is as bad as our kit we maybe can look forward to a brighter future in Pmgrid once we next bring Opensim up to the latest release too.</p>
<p>Thanks for all this sterling work guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thought</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8495</link>
		<dc:creator>thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8495</guid>
		<description>Interesting, what are you using instead of OpenJPEG for J2K images?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, what are you using instead of OpenJPEG for J2K images?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Frisby</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8494</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Frisby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8494</guid>
		<description>Yeah, next week Intel has asked to run the test on some of their hardware (pending a internal confirmation), which should be very interesting. I&#039;m hoping with a little more publicity and notice, we can try really seriously aim for 150. We only were 15 shy of 100 this week, if we can add another 25-50, we&#039;d be there.

The great thing is - this is a worst-case sim to be profiling, Mono and Wright Plazas are both notorious for bad behaviour. Getting them running - and running well is an achievement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, next week Intel has asked to run the test on some of their hardware (pending a internal confirmation), which should be very interesting. I&#8217;m hoping with a little more publicity and notice, we can try really seriously aim for 150. We only were 15 shy of 100 this week, if we can add another 25-50, we&#8217;d be there.</p>
<p>The great thing is &#8211; this is a worst-case sim to be profiling, Mono and Wright Plazas are both notorious for bad behaviour. Getting them running &#8211; and running well is an achievement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle G</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8493</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8493</guid>
		<description>Congrats Team OSGrid on stealing the single sim avatar count title!  We shall be back!  Let&#039;s see if next week we can get 100 I think I could add 25-50 real clients next week over what we added this round to the test.  Amazing work by the core devs, Intel, IBM and others making this advancement happen.  150 reliably per sim on Opensimulator &amp; things really start getting interesting.

Fellow Grid RG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats Team OSGrid on stealing the single sim avatar count title!  We shall be back!  Let&#8217;s see if next week we can get 100 I think I could add 25-50 real clients next week over what we added this round to the test.  Amazing work by the core devs, Intel, IBM and others making this advancement happen.  150 reliably per sim on Opensimulator &amp; things really start getting interesting.</p>
<p>Fellow Grid RG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Llewellyn</title>
		<link>http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/2009/10/85-users/comment-page-1/#comment-8492</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Llewellyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/?p=478#comment-8492</guid>
		<description>This is frickin&#039; awesome. I&#039;ve been watching the devs knock themselves out on crashes and fixes, and people should know just how much hard work has been done.

Apropos of nothing, I just love the view of the mini-map in the picture. Reminds me of something out of a movie, where they show the ground-zero of an epidemic outbreak. Hehe. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is frickin&#8217; awesome. I&#8217;ve been watching the devs knock themselves out on crashes and fixes, and people should know just how much hard work has been done.</p>
<p>Apropos of nothing, I just love the view of the mini-map in the picture. Reminds me of something out of a movie, where they show the ground-zero of an epidemic outbreak. Hehe. <img src='http://www.adamfrisby.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
